By Naomi Jagoda
and Jonathan Easley - 09/23/19 06:00 AM EDT
2,366
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share
to FacebookFacebookShare to TwitterTwitter
(D-Mass.) is coming under increasing pressure
from her 2020 rivals to spell out how she’d pay for her “Medicare for All”
proposal.
The pressure
comes as Warren builds momentum in the presidential primary race and suggests
she is likely to come under a harsher spotlight as other candidates seek to
compete with her for the 2020 Democratic nomination.
Warren has been
asked several times whether taxes would have to go up on the middle class to
pay for her universal health care plan, most notably at the debate earlier this
month in Houston.
She has consistently avoided giving a yes or no answer, saying instead that
middle-class families’ overall health costs would decline but without
specifying whether their taxes would increase.
Other Democrats
are now accusing her of being less than candid or even dishonest about the
consequences Medicare for All, an issue that has split the 2020 Democratic
presidential field.
Former Vice
President Joe Biden, the
front-runner in the race who is trying to hold off Warren, has made the issue
central to his attacks on Medicare for All, saying that at least Sen. Bernie Sanders
(I-Vt.) has been honest that middle-class taxes would have to go up.
Sanders has put
out a paper on potential financing options for Medicare for All, which include
tax increases that would only apply to the rich and corporations as well as a 4
percent premium paid by employees that would apply to families making more than
$29,000. He has explicitly said that taxes would go up for the middle class but
that health care costs would go down.
South Bend, Ind.,
Mayor Pete Buttigieg, who has lost ground to Warren in recent months,
last week offered one of the sharper criticisms of the Massachusetts senator
over the issue.
“I think that if
you are proud of your plan and it's the right plan, you should defend it in
straightforward terms,” Buttigieg said in an interview on CNN.
“And I think it's
puzzling that when everybody knows the answer to that question, of whether her
plan and Sen. Sanders's plan will raise middle-class taxes, is ‘yes,’ why you
wouldn't just say so and then explain why you think that's the better way
forward.”
In a sign of how
broadly the issue is being scrutinized, “Late Show” host Stephen Colbert
confronted Warren directly about taxes and Medicare for All last week,
effectively calling her out for dodging on the issue.
“How are you
going to pay for it?” Colbert asked. “Are you going to be raising the
middle-class taxes?"
Warren responded
by saying that “costs are going to go up for the wealthiest Americans, for big
corporations ... and hard-working middle class families are going to see their
costs going down.”
“But will their
taxes go up?” Colbert asked again.
“But here’s the
thing,” Warren responded.
Colbert
interrupted her.
“But here’s the
thing,” he said. "I've listened to these answers a few times before and I
just want to make a parallel suggestion to you that you might defend the taxes
perhaps that you’re not mentioning in your sentence."
Warren supports
the bill authored by Sanders that eliminates private insurers, but that would
also eliminate deductibles and copays and would ensure everyone is covered.
Warren has
sidestepped the tax issue in interviews but has said that corporations and the
wealthy will pay for the costs of Medicare for All. She’s also emphasized that
the nation will see lower health care costs as a result of the plan.
“The answer is on
Medicare for All, costs are going to go up for wealthier individuals and costs
are going to go up for giant corporations,” Warren said at the debate earlier
this month in Houston. “But for hard-working families across this country,
costs are going to go down and that's how it should work under Medicare for All
in our health care system.”
Some Warren allies have defended her approach while criticizing those
questioning her about whether Medicare for All will lead to
higher middle-class taxes.
“Medicare for All
will greatly reduce costs on the middle class, including premiums and $5,000
deductibles that make insurance policies unusable for many families,” said Joe
Dinkin, campaigns director for the Working Families Party, which endorsed
Warren last week. “That kind of question is a ridiculous trap and Warren
navigated it deftly. It's bad journalism not to recognize the larger savings
from the disappearance of premiums in any question like that."
Adam Green —
co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, which has also
endorsed Warren — said that when it comes to Warren’s answers to the tax
question, “there’s growing frustration by pundits, but there’s growing
admiration by Democratic voters who are frustrated with Democratic politicians
repeating right-wing talking points to their detriment.”
But Marc Goldwein
of the budget watchdog group the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
took issue with the progressive criticism.
He said “it’s not
only a fair, but it’s a really important question” to ask candidates how
they’re going to pay for getting rid of premiums and deductibles.
The Democratic
race has been dominated by the debate over health care, with Warren and Sanders
backing Medicare for All and Biden, Buttigieg and other candidates backing more
moderate proposals that would maintain a role for private health insurance.
Buttigieg
released a plan last week that allows people with insurance through their
employer to either keep it or join a new government plan. He has said he’d pay
for his plan through unspecified cost savings and corporate tax changes.
Democrats who
oppose Medicare for All are warning that the multitrillion-dollar price tag
will bankrupt the government. And they say that Medicare for All, although
popular in the polls, is a surefire general election loser, as voters will be
scared off by the higher taxes and the prospect of losing their private
health insurance plans.
In a preview of
how the issue could play out in the general election, Americans for Tax Reform,
the group led by Grover Norquist, has been highlighting a portion of Colbert’s
interview with Warren.
“If a Democrat
refuses to answer a question about whether they will raise taxes you know it’s because
the answer is ‘yes,’” said Erin Perrine, a spokeswoman for President Trump’s
campaign. “Elizabeth Warren’s government takeover of health care eliminates
private health insurance and gives free health care to illegal immigrants paid
for by hardworking Americans.”
Democratic
strategist Brad Bannon said that if he were advising Warren, he’d tell her to
say taxes will go up but that people’s overall health costs would be lower. He
argued that Warren’s indirectness could be a problem both in the primary and
the general election.
“By not answering the question directly, it
seems evasive, and that’s not a message you want to send,” Bannon said. “Bite
the bullet because you can make the sale.”
No comments:
Post a Comment