MICHAEL BRADY January 30, 2020
The CMS on
Thursday unveiled an optional demonstration that would allow states to extend
Medicaid coverage to adults that don't qualify otherwise in exchange for capped
funding.
Under the Healthy
Adult Opportunity initiative, states could share cost savings with the federal
government and extend Medicaid coverage to more residents in exchange for
taking on more financial risk.
"While
available funding will be capped in the aggregate, states will not have the
ability to cap enrollment and still receive the enhanced federal match rate
available to the expansion population," a CMS factsheet on the initiative
said.
Oklahoma governor
Kevin Stitt, a Republican, on Thursday said his state would apply for a Healthy
Adult Opportunity waiver during an event showcasing the initiative. He said the
state's application would likely include cost-sharing premiums and a work
requirement, as well as higher payments for rural providers, telehealth
services and greater access to opioid treatment.
But Stitt will
have to win support from the state Legislature to move forward with the waiver
application.
All states are
eligible to participate in the initiative, which would allow states to extend
Medicaid coverage to adults under 65 years old who don't qualify for Medicaid
because of disability, long-term care needs or who don't qualify for a state
plan. The CMS would allow participating states to change cost-sharing
requirements, align benefits and drug formularies with what commercial payers
offer, make program changes with less federal oversight and waive retroactive
coverage and hospital presumptive eligibility requirements.
"By
incentivizing value, this approach won't simply result in higher quality care
for beneficiaries in the present, but will also safeguard quality care for
future beneficiaries by putting the program on a sustainable path," CMS
Administrator Seema Verma said on a press call Thursday.
The capped
funding would be calculated by looking at a state's costs for a prior year,
population and the demonstration's benefits. Federal contributions in future
years would not be altered for Medicaid enrollment changes.
Families USA
executive director Frederick Isasi immediately criticized the Trump
administration guidance Thursday, warning that it could wreak havoc on Medicaid
beneficiaries and state budgets.
"With state
budgets already stretched thin, accepting Medicaid block grants could likely
amount to willful fiscal malpractice and blatant disregard for the needs and
interests of states and families," he said.
States don't have
strong incentives to apply for a Healthy Adult Opportunity waiver because they
would take on more financial risk for the expanded population without receiving
much additional flexibility. Most of the flexibility afforded to states under
the plan is already available under Medicaid 1115 waivers, including the
ability to institute a work requirement, adjust cost-sharing or eliminate
retroactive coverage.
"The notable
thing is that there isn't that much new flexibility for states," said
Jocelyn Guyer, managing director at Manatt Health. "At the end of the day,
it's largely 'do you want to take a cap on your federal Medicaid funds.'"
Under the total
expense model, states would have to spend 80% or more of the target amount on
health services. If states generate savings without reducing quality or access,
the federal government would share the savings with them. But states would have
to give up matching federal funds in order to receive cost savings. So most
state Medicaid programs would be in a worse financial position than if they
went forward with a conventional Medicaid expansion.
"The state
doesn't get to keep all of the savings, so you have to wonder how strong of an
incentive that is," said Joseph Antos, a resident fellow at the American
Enterprise Institute.
Red states could
see the demonstration as a conservative approach to Medicaid expansion, but the
initiative prohibits enrollment caps and partial expansions, two policy tools
that many experts think would be important to making capped Medicaid funding
work by containing costs.
"I think
it's particularly risky for a state like Oklahoma to pursue an expansion under
this kind of authority given that they're stuck with a limited amount of
federal funding," Guyer said. "It's putting yourself in a very tight
spot."
Most
non-expansion states haven't expanded their Medicaid programs for political or
ideological reasons, rather than financial ones.
"I don't see
this as doing much to help a state that is feeling fiscal pressure," Antos
said. "To get real savings calls for healthcare delivery reform ... it's
delivery reform that's the hard part"
Hospitals and
other providers are unlikely to change how they deliver healthcare because of
the new demonstration because the affected population is too small for it to
make an impact, he said.
The Healthy Adult
Opportunity initiative isn't a traditional block grant, which isn't permitted
under the CMS' waiver authority. It does little to address conservatives'
concerns about Medicaid's fiscal integrity, which largely stem from improper
supplemental payments.
"There's
nothing in (the initiative) that's going to change that," Antos said.
Under the current
system, the federal government matches state Medicaid funding dollar for
dollar.
The Trump administration withdrew its proposed
guidance to states on Medicaid block grants from regulatory review in November
without an explanation. At the time, several experts speculated that the
instructions could be long delayed or put on permanent hiatus, especially if
the administration believed the proposal would increase federal spending.
"The failure
to update the Medicaid program is something that this administration has felt
has needed to be addressed for a long time. Absent Congressional action,
Administrator Verma has vigorously worked to improve this program through
administrative action," said Joe Grogan, assistant to President Donald
Trump and director of the Domestic Policy Council.
Many legal
experts think that the Trump administration can't use the Section 1115 waiver
process to waive Medicaid's matching funds system and expect that any such
effort will lead to a battle in the courts.
"I think
that any state that takes this up is walking itself right into a lawsuit,"
Guyer said.
Politicians in
Alaska, Oklahoma and Tennessee had expressed interest in converting their
state Medicaid programs to a block grant. Last fall, Tennessee submitted a block grant proposal to the CMS
that would allow it to receive an inflation-adjusted block grant that could be
adjusted upward on a per capita basis if enrollment grows. Tennessee's request
includes a broader population than what's allowed under the new guidance so the
CMS is considering it separately, Verma said. The waiver is pending approval.
Tennessee will
continue with its existing waiver application, but the state's Medicaid program
is supportive of the new approach.
"We are
excited about CMS' recognition that the misaligned incentives of Medicaid
financing do not necessarily drive quality, value, or fiscal
sustainability," TennCare said in a statement. "Specifically, it is
encouraging that CMS recognizes that states should have the opportunity to earn
shared savings through quality-based performance that can then be reinvested in
their Medicaid programs and the health (not just health care) of their Medicaid
members."
Conservative
policymakers have previously supported replacing Medicaid's open-ended funding
with block grants because they think it will incentivize states to spend
Medicaid funds more judiciously and reduce federal healthcare spending. They
also argue that it would give states more flexibility to respond to their
unique healthcare challenges.
But many
healthcare experts worry that under a block grant, states might have to slash
their Medicaid rolls or payments to disproportionate-share
hospitals to get program spending under control. That could lead to significant
coverage losses and reduce access to care for some of the most vulne rable
populations. It could also hurt doctors and hospitals by increasing the amount
of uncompensated care that they provide.
In September
2017, Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Bill Cassidy (R-La.) floated
a bill that would have changed Medicaid to a block-grant program. The bill
would have ended the enhanced matching rate for the Medicaid expansion and
replaced it with a lump sum far below existing federal funding. It would have
also instituted a per capita spending cap to replace the current system of
matching funds.
The Senate never
voted on it thanks to political blowback after the Congressional Budget Office
said that millions of people would lose coverage if the package went into
effect.
No comments:
Post a Comment