Tuesday, April 14, 2020

Experts: Funding COVID-19 Care for Uninsured Isn’t Substitute for Reopening HealthCare.gov


Facing mounting criticism for deciding not to allow a special enrollment period (SEP) on the federal health insurance exchange amid the COVID-19 crisis, the Trump administration offered to funnel a portion of the $100 billion in funding earmarked for U.S. hospitals in the latest emergency stimulus bill to cover providers’ costs of delivering COVID-19 care for the uninsured.
But "covering only hospital costs for COVID-19 for people who are uninsured is hardly a replacement for health insurance," says Larry Levitt, the executive vice president for health policy at the Kaiser Family Foundation.
"In general, I take the view that where possible, it's better to get people comprehensive coverage," says Sabrina Corlette, a research professor at the Georgetown University Health Policy Institute. Ideally, she adds, the federal government would both allow a federal SEP for HealthCare.gov and reimburse hospitals for uncompensated care related to COVID-19.
On April 10, HHS released more details about the first round of stimulus funding for hospitals, saying it partnered with UnitedHealth Group "to provide rapid payment to providers eligible for the distribution of the initial $30 billion in funds." HHS said it's working on "additional targeted distributions" for particularly hard-hit providers, adding that "this supplemental funding will also be used to reimburse providers for COVID-19 care for uninsured Americans."
A recent analysis from the Kaiser Family Foundation estimated that total payments to hospitals for treating uninsured patients under the Trump administration's policy could range from $13.9 billion to $41.8 billion.
Both Levitt and Corlette point out that the administration's plan doesn't appear to address bills that uninsured patients might receive from physicians or other services rendered in the hospital, which typically arrive separately from the hospital bill itself. Further, they note that uninsured patients could face steep bills if they're treated for a condition that turns out not to be COVID-19.

No comments:

Post a Comment