Thursday, April 16, 2020

Slow Biosimilar Adoption and Opaque Markets Impede Potential Savings


Biosimilar medications can offer meaningful cost savings for payers, but market and regulatory barriers are still preventing them from realizing their full economic potential, according to a March 31 Johns Hopkins University study funded by the ERISA Industry Committee.
"We could see and empirically prove that patients…tended to be better off if they were on the biosimilar," says Mariana Socal, a physician and researcher at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and one of the study's authors. "They had lower out-of-pocket costs when they were on the biosimilar."
While 16 biosimilars have earned FDA approval, according to the report, most of those drugs are the only biosimilar in their category, creating a duopoly price structure rather than robust market competition with at least three drugs.
Per the report, multiple biosimilars have entered the market for only two drugs, Remicade (infliximab) and Neupogen (filgrastim). The report concludes that, in those categories, biosimilar competition has generated remarkable cost savings and has the potential to generate much more through increased biosimilar use.
Socal says she believes opaque markets are to blame for biologics' limited impact on drug markets at scale.
"When we looked at [the study companies'] formularies and their utilization, we were surprised to see that even within the same company, they had such a remarkable diversity in terms of biosimilar market share, in terms of the prices they were paying, and how much biosimilars they were able to use," Socal says. She adds that PBMs should do more to inform their clients about the potential savings from higher biosimilar use in formularies.
Steve Cutts, head of specialty pharmacy for the PBM Magellan Rx Management, says that Magellan makes an overt effort to tell clients about the potential price savings from biosimilars.
Cutts says that many biologics are administered through a medical benefit, rather than a pharmacy benefit. That claims structure could explain some of the limited visibility of biosimilar substitution opportunities for plan administrators designing formularies, and would require coordination with providers to be addressed.

No comments:

Post a Comment