Press
of Atlantic City (NJ)
November 6, 2017
Dede Kennedy-Simington, an insurance
agent in Pasadena, California, was "totally dismayed" when she
learned recently the premium on her family's Blue Shield PPO would rise $391 a
month next year - driven largely by huge increases for her two teenage
children.
The cost of insuring her 16-year-old
daughter will spike 60 percent in 2018, and it will jump 38 percent for her
13-year-old son.
The price surge stems from a change
in federal regulations that allows insurers to recalculate the health risks of
children within a family's premium bill.
"This hurts us, but it will be a
total nonstarter for a lot of families," Kennedy-Simington said.
Despite the policy change for
children, they will still be considerably cheaper to cover than their parents.
In Kennedy-Simington's case, her two
teens account for more than half of the premium increase but less than
one-third of the total 2018 premium.
Premiums are rising for a lot of
reasons next year. Among the most publicized is a decision by the Trump
administration to stop paying insurers for certain subsidies they provide to
low-income health plan enrollees under the Affordable Care Act.
Another factor is the complicated new
rule, approved last year by the Obama administration, that allows insurance
companies to assign more of a family's overall premium cost to children in
individual and small-group policies, starting in 2018.
It also allows insurers to charge
higher rates for teens than for younger children beginning at age 15, because
teenagers typically rack up bigger medical bills.
Until now, the ACA has not allowed
any difference in the charge for children from birth to 20.
"A 15-year-old running around on
his bike has more chance of something happening to him than a 7-year-old
playing video games," said Ron Goldstein, CEO of Choice Administrators, an
Orange, Calif.-based health insurance exchange for small businesses. "You
get into high school, there's football and contact sports."
Open enrollment for 2018 in the
individual market, on and off the insurance exchanges, started Wednesday.
The new age-related rule applies in
most states. New Jersey, Alabama, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Oregon
and Utah and Washington D.C., do not follow the federal rate-setting formula,
because they have their own.
The U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services said it revised the way premiums for people under age 21 are
calculated to better reflect the cost of medical care for children. The change
will also "provide a more gradual transition" to pricier adult rates,
the agency said.
Under the previous ACA age
calculations, turning 21 ushered in an adult rate with a steep 57.5 percent increase.
Adult rates then typically increased
incrementally each year to reflect the higher medical costs associated with
aging, though they are eventually capped at three times the rate of a 21-year
old to promote affordability for seniors.
The formula for calculating annual
increases for adults older than 21 will not change.
Under the new rule, health plans can
charge a one-time 20.5 percent increase next year for children 0 to 14.
For kids ages 15-20, rates will rise
every year, starting with a sharp hike in 2018 followed by much smaller ones
after that.
For 2018, the increases range from
31.2 percent for 15-year-olds to 52.8 percent for 20-year-olds. Those hikes are
already baked in to the premiums insurers have set for their 2018 offerings.
And they are related only to age - there may be additional increases to cover
the overall rise in medical costs.
Although the rate hikes are bigger
for 15- to 20-year-olds, medical expenses for infants are actually higher,
according to the nonpartisan Health Care Cost Institute in Washington, D.C.
They drop after age 3, then rise again during the preteen and teenage years,
according to the institute.
HHS said a single rate category for
children ages 0 to 14 makes sense because it "spreads the cost of
newborns, avoiding significant premium increases for families with young
children."
As a result of the sharp one-time
increase in 2018, a customer turning 21 the next year would face an age-related
bump of only 3.1 percent rather than the 57.5 percent jump that would have applied
under the old rule, according to HHS' revised rate formula.
Some insurance agents predict the
bump in charges for kids will add to anxiety about higher premiums,
particularly given President Donald Trump's recent cut of federal payments for
a key consumer subsidy, shortening open-enrollment periods in most states to 45
days, and Congress' failed attempts to repeal Obamacare.
"Of all years to do this ... all
these increases are just going to be horrifying," said Helena Ruffin, an
insurance agent in Los Angeles.
In addition to a 12.3 percent average
statewide premium increase, Covered California, the state's Obamacare exchange,
tacked a 12.4 percent surcharge onto "silver-tier" plans - the
second-least-expensive level of coverage - to offset Trump's decision to end
federal payments for so-called cost-sharing reduction subsidies, which lower
out-of-pocket costs for some low-income consumers.
In many states, premium hikes will be
much higher next year.
Covered California spokesman James
Scullary said next year's rate increases will be offset by a corresponding rise
in premium tax credits, so the vast majority of consumers who qualify for those
tax credits will be protected from the surcharge.
Scullary said Covered California did
not have a figure to show how much the rate increase for kids contributed to
the average statewide premium hike, but he said the overall impact was
"very small."
But for many families - especially
those with more than one child and no tax credits to absorb their rising
premiums - the impact isn't small.
People like Kennedy-Simington, who
buy their insurance in the individual market outside of Covered California,
don't have subsidized premiums.
Neither do employees of small
businesses, who are also subject to the new rates for children. One renewal
notice for a small-group Health Net PPO, which covers three adults and two
teenagers, shows that the kids - ages 15 and 18 - account for 60 percent of
next year's total $412 premium increase.
But there may be one small silver
lining: Adults may benefit, at least modestly, from spreading the rising cost
of medical care across a wider age band.
The American Academy of Actuaries
said in a report that raising rates for children to better reflect their costs
will reduce adult rates, though by a "significantly smaller
magnitude." The reductions will vary by insurer and depend on the number
of children enrolled relative to the number of adults.
Kaiser Permanente said its rate
increases for children would result in "slightly lower increases to older
members."
Kennedy-Simington, a past president
of the Los Angeles Association of Health Underwriters, said families with
children should compare all possible insurance options, and check to see if
they qualify for premium tax credits through Covered California.
"The only way to get prices down
is to move from one carrier to another or to downgrade," she said.
"So shopping will be critical."
https://insurancenewsnet.com/oarticle/big-health-insurance-hike-blame-kids#.WgC9oFVuKJA
No comments:
Post a Comment