March 12, 201910:19 AM ET
GREG
ROSALSKY
Every year, medical students apply for residencies at hospitals
around the country through the National Resident
Matching Program. It's like a dating app for med students and
hospitals, and it culminates this Friday, which is Match Day, when more than 30,000 students find
out who they've got a really long date with.
Some people view Match Week as a beautifully engineered dance
between supply and demand that ensures the best and brightest learn how to be
good doctors at top hospitals. Others, like Dean Baker, Senior Economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, say this
residency system makes health care dramatically more expensive for Americans. A
2011 study in Health Affairs found American
doctors, who make an average salary of
almost $300,000, are paid around twice as much as
doctors in other rich countries.
Baker says "doctors are seriously overpaid" and a big
reason is rules that restrict the number of people who can get residencies. He
calls these rules the work of "a cartel," and in economics, those are
fighting words. A cartel limits the supply of something in order to increase
the amount of money they can charge. The Organization of the Petroleum
Exporting Countries, or OPEC, is a classic example.
The residency bottleneck
Baker argues that the U.S. residency system turns away thousands
of perfectly qualified students every year. These include many foreign doctors,
who are barred from practicing here unless they complete a residency within the
country. While the number of residencies has increased about 26% over the last
decade, Baker (and the Association of
American Medical Colleges) argues it's a bottleneck preventing an
adequate supply of doctors.
Most of the funding for residencies comes from the Medicare
program, and Congress capped the number of residencies the program funds in
1997. "It was originally frozen as a response to lobbying from doctors who
were complaining that there were too many doctors," Baker says. Trade
groups for doctors have also been lobbying against allowing
nurse practitioners, physician assistants and other medical
professionals to play a larger role in treating patients. The result of
policies like these, Baker argues, is a market with less competition, driving
up prices for everyone.
Baker estimates that the salaries of the roughly one million
doctors in the U.S. account for about eight percent of total
healthcare spending. He estimates that
allowing an increased supply of doctors to lower their salaries to competitive
levels would save Americans $100 billion a year — or roughly $300 per person.
A second opinion
There are strong arguments that doctors aren't overpaid. They
are highly skilled professionals who save lives and have the brains and work
ethic to make lots of money in other sectors, like law or finance. On top of
that, many work long hours and are saddled with lots of student debt after
years of education.
The American Medical Association, one of the main organizations
representing U.S. doctors, says the total number of doctors has more than
quadrupled since 1965, greatly outpacing population growth. The association
says it's "actively working to alleviate a maldistribution of physicians
that is responsible for [a doctor] shortage in many states." This includes
increasing the size and number of med schools and funding for residencies.
It currently supports the Resident Physician
Shortage Reduction Act of 2019, which would increase the number of
Medicare-funded residency slots by 15,000 over five years.
But, Baker argues, just because the AMA now supports expanding
the number of residencies doesn't mean they and other doctor organizations
don't have their fingers on the scale. "OPEC sometimes votes to increase
the supply of oil," Baker says. "That doesn't mean that OPEC isn't
restricting the supply of oil and pushing up the price."
But what about economists...
Awkwardly, it did occur to us that there might be another cartel
of professionals limiting their supply in order to increase their incomes. It's
a group we talk a lot about at Planet Money:
economists. Are they also colluding to make it hard to enter their ranks?
"It is somewhat of a cartel," Baker says about his
profession. "So, yeah, there's a natural tendency for any profession to try to limit its supply and push
up wages for its members, but really none have been as successful as
doctors."
https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2019/03/12/702500408/are-doctors-overpaid?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Issue:%202019-03-13%20Healthcare%20Dive%20%5Bissue:19857%5D&utm_term=Healthcare%20Dive
No comments:
Post a Comment