March 08, 2019 01:46 PM
Congressional Medicaid advisers on Friday
questioned whether the Trump administration should include Medicaid in
its major proposal to ban
middleman rebates from Medicare Part D.
Medicaid has been an overlooked component of the
proposed rule, whose chief goal is to lower out-of-pocket costs for people with
Medicare prescription drug plans. Medicaid is a different animal: people with
Medicaid insurance pay only a nominal amount at the drug counter whereas
Medicare beneficiaries can be on the hook for high copays.
Still, Medicaid could see downstream effects
from the regulation if it is finalized as suggested, given the administration's
proposed overhaul of the rebate system.
Members of the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and
Access Commission (MACPAC) advisory panel want to make sure HHS safeguards the
supplemental rebates that manufacturers offer Medicaid. Since these rebates
aren't defined in statute, the panel said the department should specifically
protect them under safe harbor laws.
But given the proposed rule's potential
complications for Medicaid's supplemental rebate structure, commissioners
warned the administration might be complicating matters by including Medicaid
in a regulation that doesn't actually touch the program's enrollees.
"In my head I'm calling into question, Why
is Medicaid even in this, if the point is to get money to Medicare
beneficiaries?" commissioner Melanie Bella said. "The situation is
quite different here. The easiest thing to me would be to say, Take Medicaid out.
We're talking about analysis and assumptions, but we're kind of
overcomplicating it. I think the core question is, What are you trying to
achieve by putting Medicaid in it?"
Commissioner William Scanlon agreed with Bella
that keeping Medicaid out of the rule entirely would be the "most clean
solution."
But he said since the proposal's overarching
goal is to return dollars to Medicare enrollees, MACPAC should focus on
protecting Medicaid's supplemental rebates.
Commissioner Darin Gordon joined other skeptics
of the rule and argued that it's far from clear or guaranteed that
pharmaceutical companies will lower their list prices or pass the rebates
directly to patients at point of sale, as envisioned by the administration. If
manufacturers don't lower list prices, Gordon said, costs could rise for
Medicaid.
"I'm concerned it's actually going to have
a larger negative impact on states than we're anticipating, Gordon said.
"It's hard to tell."
Lawmakers on the Senate Finance Committee last week
asked seven CEOs of top manufacturers if their companies would
lower their list prices if pharmacy benefit manager rebates went away. They
received only two commitments to lower prices — and those commitments came with
the caveat that the PBM rebates would have to be banned in the commercial
insurance as well as in Medicare.
Comments on the proposed rule are due April 1,
and MACPAC will ask HHS to protect the program's supplemental rebates in a
formal letter.
https://www.modernhealthcare.com/payment/macpac-wants-part-d-rule-protect-medicaid-supplemental-rebates?utm_source=modern-healthcare-daily-dose-friday&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20190308&utm_content=article5-headline
No comments:
Post a Comment