Social Security boosts retirement security for those who
otherwise have none, according to data from the Center for Retirement Research.
Any decisions made
regarding Social Security need
to consider the changing diversity of the U.S. and the greater impact that the
safety net program has on minorities and those with low to middle incomes.
So says a new brief from
the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, which analyzed data from
the Health and Retirement Study to see just how much Social Security affected
the retirement wealth of whites, blacks and Hispanics during 1992–2016.
The disparity between typical white households
and minority households when it comes to retirement funds is shockingly large
without Social Security, with the former having 5–7 times the funds of the
latter. However, when Social Security is added into the equation, the gap falls
to 2–3 times.
When one considers that the wealth
calculation, without Social Security, includes such sources as defined benefit
plans (pensions), defined contribution plans (401(k)s), housing wealth and any
other wealth not resulting from a retirement plan—stocks, bonds, mutual funds
and other investments, as well as checking and savings account balances—the
fact that Social Security alone, with its progressive benefits, can cut that
gap so substantially really drives home how important the program is to those
it was devised to help: people without, or without much, retirement savings.
It works pretty much the same way for lower-
and middle-income households compared to those at the high end of the income
chain, since, as the brief says, “Social Security reduces inequality because it
covers nearly all workers and has a progressive benefit design, making it the
most equal form of retirement wealth.”
The report concludes that policymakers need to
consider this outsized effect on the lower-income and minority segments of the
population, since the outsized effect of Social Security in equalizing
retirees’ income will have an equally outsized effect if any changes that
reduce benefits—such as increases in the Full Retirement Age—are considered.
What they will do, instead of solving any fiscal problems with Social Security,
says the report, “would tend to increase retirement wealth inequality.”
No comments:
Post a Comment