In a Sept. 9 webinar hosted by the Brookings Institution and
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, leading health care economists debated the
value of government intervention in prices.
The event was held in honor of the late Princeton economist Uwe
Reinhardt, who advocated for the U.S. to shift to an all-payer system along the
lines of his native Germany, in which prices for health care services and
products are subject to uniform schedules.
In the panel discussion, debate centered on what causes high
prices in the first place.
"Looking at price variation should make us curious about
why is there price variation, as opposed to saying, 'because there's price
variation, we need to regulate the prices,'" said Amitabh Chandra, a
professor at the Harvard Kennedy School and Harvard Business School. Chandra
argued that consumer choice must account for some of the variation in prices
for the same procedure even within regional markets.
That position sparked criticism from the other panelists, who
observed that the opacity of pricing and the market dynamics of health
insurance mean that consumers are unlikely to have an accurate perception of
the true cost of a procedure.
Melinda Buntin, chair of the Department of Health Policy at
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, observed that the localized, consolidated
structure of health care markets also means consumers have limited choices.
"Time after time in health care, we get into the situation
where high prices are associated with greater supply of things," said
Buntin. "We also have a situation where we don’t have exactly monopolies,
but hospitals are really multi-product firms. They don't have a monopoly in
every single one of their service lines; they try to leverage the monopoly they
have overall, or their reputation, to negotiate with insurers. They clearly
maximize their margins of their rents by providing more of some services and
less of others."
"I would also challenge the idea of choice here," said
Daria Pelech, a principal analyst at the Congressional Budget Office. Pelech
observed that, because commercial insurance premiums are subsidized by the
federal government through tax write-offs and premiums are pooled at the group
level, the group membership of a plan subsidizes the expensive health care
choices of individual members.
No comments:
Post a Comment