Eakinomics: What
Comes Next?
Yesterday all eyes were trained on Congress, and today all the ink will be
spilled on the massive legislation it jammed over the finish line. Some will
praise the stimulus, others will pan its size or effectiveness, and not a few
will take note of the enormous range of good, bad, and ugly miscellaneous
provisions that went along for the ride.
The legislation has been advertised as “must pass” and, because of its
economic benefits, “free.” But, alas, nothing in life is really free, and
this will come with costs as well. There will be more debt – roughly $1
trillion more. Even though the Congressional Budget Office has lowered its
outlook for interest rates (and freely admits it cannot be sure that they
will stay low), the carrying cost of the debt will claim more budget
resources in the future, crowding out other budgetary priorities. And, as the
economy returns to full employment, it will crowd out activities in the
private sector, hurting productivity and real wage growth.
I have always said that the United States should spend what is needed to spur
the recovery; one suspects not everything that got voted on yesterday fits
that description. But the federal government entered the pandemic with an
unsustainable budget outlook. It will exit the pandemic with a record high
level of debt (relative to gross domestic product) and a continued
unsustainable budget outlook. A very minimal condition for a sovereign nation
is that it be able to stabilize its debt (relative to gross domestic
product); the United States has failed to ever do that in the 21st century.
A cost of yesterday’s legislation is to make that impossible political task
even harder.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment