Speech
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 27, 2018
Contact: CMS Media Relations
(202) 690-6145 | CMS Media Inquiries
Remarks by Administrator Seema Verma at the 2018 Medicaid
Managed Care Summit
(As prepared for delivery – September 27, 2018)
It is great to be back in front
of a room full of professionals dedicated to improving the lives of Medicaid
beneficiaries. For me, it’s a little like coming home. I see the faces of the
people out working on the front lines, of transforming the American health
care system, working to making Medicaid a stronger and more sustainable
program.
Medicaid is more than a
safety-net program. It’s our nation’s commitment to care for our most
vulnerable citizens. And I believe that societies, throughout history, should
not just be judged by their wealth and influence, but they should also be
judged by how they treat those who are less fortunate. Since its inception
Medicaid has served as a powerful tool in making sure that our nation’s most
vulnerable can get the care they need.
People tell me that I am a
realist. I guess you have to be to take on this job.
And the reality at CMS … is
pretty refreshing right now. We are making great progress on a goal I set
nearly a year ago as I outlined an aggressive agenda aimed at transforming
Medicaid…the largest program at CMS serving more than 80 million
beneficiaries. Our strategy is centered on 3 key pillars:
Those central themes have been
our guiding strategy as we’ve worked to deliver on our early commitments to
ushering in a new day in the Medicaid program.
So let’s begin with Flexibility.
Giving states the flexibility is more than just paying for health care – it’s
empowering them to act on what works best for the citizens in their
community. And this is necessary if we are truly serious about improving the health
outcomes of the most vulnerable Americans. State and local officials know
much more about the unique needs of their friends and neighbors than
Washington DC does.
To this end, we are proposing
modifications to a few of our regulations; including the Medicaid Access to
Care Rule and the Medicaid Managed Care Rule, and with each of these proposed
rules, we have worked closely with states in an unprecedented manner to
promote individual choice and local control – leading to better health
outcomes for Americans on Medicaid.
But we cannot regulate our way to
innovation.
To elicit meaningful reform, the
best thing that CMS can do is create a fertile ground for states to serve as
the laboratories of innovation in Medicaid policy...and then get out of their
way. And that’s why we’ve opened opportunities for states to seek
demonstrations to test new and exciting reforms.
And under our more flexible
approach to waivers, CMS has approved 10 additional Substance disorder
demonstrations – these include:
Indiana
New Jersey
Kentucky
Utah
Louisiana
Illinois
Vermont
New Hampshire
Pennsylvania and
Washington state
– which with the prior approvals
means that more than a quarter of the states have committed to building out a
more complete continuum of services to help individuals fighting addiction.
Additionally, in January, we
released a groundbreaking new demonstration opportunity in response to state
requests to test work and community engagement incentives among able-bodied
adult beneficiaries. This guidance was followed by four approvals of
innovative Medicaid demonstrations.
We are committed to this issue
and we are moving closer to approving even more state waivers.
As such, I’m happy to share with
you today that we have finalized the terms for our next innovative community
engagement demonstration, which we expect to deliver to the state very soon.
So stay tuned!
But this is not a policy that is
without controversy. I have heard the criticisms… and felt the resistance…but
I reject the premise, and here is why: it is not compassionate to trap people
on government programs, or create greater dependency on public assistance as
we expand programs like Medicaid.
True Compassion is giving people
the tools necessary for self-sufficiency… allowing able-bodied, working age
adults to experience the dignity of a job, of contributing to their own care,
and gaining a foothold on the path to independence.
From my experience working
directly with indigent patients in the early phases of my career, I saw
first-hand that no one sets out in life with the goal of relying on the
government. Personal responsibility and self-sufficiency are bedrock American
values.
And there is clear evidence that
people are happier and healthier when they are working and leading
independent, self-sufficient lives. Arthur Brooks of the American Enterprise
Institute, wrote a book about the concept of earned success. The idea that we
value what we earn much more than we value what is given to us. The drive to
earn propels us to new heights, whereas dependency limits us.
The problem too often is that the
most well-meaning government policies trap people in a hopeless cycle of
poverty, making it too difficult to escape, and too easy to become more
dependent. Instead, we ought to insist that the able-bodied participate
in earning benefits.
To quote from Arthur’s Book, the
Conservative Heart:
“Work gives people something
welfare never can. It’s a sense of self-worth and mastery, the feeling that
we are in control of our lives. This is a source of abiding joy. There’s a
reason that Aristotle wrote “happiness belongs to the self-sufficient.”
Community engagement requirements
are not some subversive attempt to just kick people off of Medicaid. Instead,
their aim is to put beneficiaries in control with the right incentives to
live healthier independent lives.
When you consider that, less than
5 years ago, Medicaid was expanded to nearly 15 million new working-age
adults, it’s fair that states want to add community engagement requirements
for those with the ability to meet them. It’s easier to give someone a card,
it’s much harder to build a ladder to help people climb their way out of
poverty. But even though it is harder, it’s the right thing to do.
Between the years 2000 and 2017,
the overall work rate for non-disabled working age adults fell by 3.4
percentage points. Over half of this decline occurred before the Great
Recession even began.
Historically, childless working
age adults were working at a rate much higher than the overall rate for
working age, able bodied adults – as you might expect. But that is changing.
In 1979, the employment rate for childless adults under 50 was almost 10
percentage points higher than the overall rate. By 2017, it was only 2.6 percentage
points higher, and, not surprisingly, this group also experienced the largest
increase in welfare.
Put simply, even before the
Recession began, childless adults under 50 were on a disturbing
trajectory…Depending less on work and self-sufficiency, and more on
government assistance.
It is therefore no surprise that,
as this group continues on an unsustainable trajectory, states have looked to
the Medicaid program to help reverse this trend, increase self-sufficiency,
and break the chains of welfare dependence.
And this motivation comes at an
incredible time of opportunity. Under President Trump’s leadership, we are
now experiencing among the lowest rates of unemployment we’ve seen in over 50
years. The Trump administration has created a booming American economy. Not
only are job opportunities on the rise, but wages grew at the fastest rate in
August since the Great Recession.
But despite these promising
signs, we also know that there is often a skills gap between those needing
employment, and the available jobs. Too many live in the shadows of
opportunity, instead of its light, because they don’t have 21st century
skills. That’s why this effort is also about helping those individuals find
new hope through education and job training opportunities.
And these policies are not blunt
instruments. We’ve worked carefully to design important protections to ensure
that states exempt individuals who have disabilities, are medically frail,
serve as primary caregivers, or have an acute medical condition that prevent
them from successfully meeting the requirement. Some have argued that a
Medicaid demonstration can never advance the program’s objectives if the
project ultimately reduces Medicaid enrollment or spending.
But I prefer to think of it more
like President Reagan, who said, “We should measure welfare’s success by how
many people leave welfare, not by how many people are added.”
As our economy thrives, it can
lift up as many Americans as possible, and lift millions off of programs like
Medicaid and instead onto private insurance. There will always be a need for
a safety net and programs like Medicaid. We want it to be there for those who
need it most.
Others believe that any
consequences for failing to comply with a program requirement, like
disenrollment or periods of non-eligibility, shouldn’t be allowed. There is
no basis for that contention. CMS has approved demonstrations that include
those exact type of incentives for failure to comply with requirements like
monthly premiums going back across several federal administrations. Even the
Children’s Health Insurance Program – or CHIP - allows states to impose
premiums and consequences for failure to pay them in certain circumstances.
Some have argued that these
demonstrations are unnecessary because nearly all Medicaid beneficiaries are
already working. To that I say – great. Then this policy won’t impact them,
and in fact if you look at Arkansas the vast majority of adults subject to
the requirement were ultimately exempted from the monthly reporting requirement
because of their steady employment. Nothing to argue about there!
We’ve also heard that the costs
associated with implementing community engagement are too high, in terms of
updating eligibility systems and providing the necessary supports. But we view
these as important investments, not unlike those we have made in other
aspects of the program, that help build capacity for states to address the
whole human needs of their beneficiaries, and one that can pay dividends as
we aim to end cycles of generational poverty. We have taken steps to ensure
that appropriate protections have been designed to shield against unintended
consequences.
We’ve strongly encouraged states
to align their Medicaid requirements with similar policies in SNAP and TANF,
and to take steps to ensure that if an individual is meeting the requirements
of one program, they aren’t having to do something different in another.
One of the most encouraging
outcomes that I’ve seen emerge in states participating in this initiative is
the level of engagement and partnership between stakeholders.
When I was in Arkansas this
spring to hand deliver their signed waiver, I heard directly from these
groups about some of the unique work happening to help lift people out of
poverty. There, the state is working with community colleges and technical
schools to connect Medicaid beneficiaries with new educational opportunities,
including partnerships with nursing homes to provide free job training for
enrollees.
In July, Arkansas became the
first state to go live with their community engagement program. And a few
weeks ago, Governor Hutchinson reported that more than 1,000 Arkansas Works
enrollees have found jobs since the program began in July. Imagine the impact
that this has had on the lives of those individuals and their families. One
specific example he cited, was a woman in Harrison, Arkansas. She visited a
Workforce Specialist and is now enrolled in LPN school at North Arkansas
Community College with financial assistance. In addition to taking classes, she
is also gaining real world experience by working at a long-term care facility
one day a week.
Governor Hutchinson also
described a gentleman in Rogers, Arkansas, who came into a workforce center
after receiving his notice in the mail. There, he received an assessment and
a referral for employment, and after nearly a year of being unemployed, is
now earning over $17 an hour.
This is earned success. It is not
granted by government, but realized through sweat, toil and initiative.
These are only a couple of
examples – but the fact is that these two lives, and potentially many more,
have been steered onto a pathway out of poverty. Over time, the woman in
Harrison and the man in Rogers may begin to earn their health insurance
through their employer, and no longer rely on government assistance, and we
should all join with them in hoping for this brighter future.
Let me be clear, there is no
shame in receiving extra help when it’s needed – that’s why we have a safety
net to care for folks on hard times. But our default position must always be
to help and encourage those who are able to lift themselves up and find their
footing again.
There is dignity and pride that
is derived from work…for paying one’s own way…and I believe it is the desire
of nearly every American to achieve financial independence.
In America we believe we can be
anything we want to be, never dictated by one’s station at birth. The migrant
farmer still dreams of one day owning the farm. The waiter still aspires to
one day own the restaurant. We don’t ascribe to the artificial barriers posed
by class…because we believe through hard work, we can realize our biggest
dreams.
While we've ushered in a new era
of state flexibility, we are also committed to enhancing our collective
accountability for delivering results on behalf of beneficiaries and
taxpayers. So that brings me to our next pillar – Accountability. Despite
growing from 10% of state budgets in 1985 to nearly 30% in 2016, Medicaid has
never developed a cohesive system of accountability that allows the public to
easily measure and check our results.
If we are going to be good
stewards of taxpayer dollars and good servants to the 80 million Americans
who depend on Medicaid and CHIP, we must be honest with ourselves and honest
with all of our stakeholders about how well we are doing. I agree with
oversight bodies like the GAO – we need to do better. That’s why we’ve been
working to enhance how we evaluate state demonstration projects, including
standardizing how certain common types of waivers get evaluated, developing
standardized metrics across waivers, and using consistent monitoring and
evaluation protocols.
This will hold true for community
engagement demonstrations, where we will be closely monitoring their
implementation and ensuring thorough independent evaluations are conducted.
But we also will not draw rash conclusions after only a few months of data
and information.
As we drive toward value across
the entire health care delivery system, we believe that greater transparency
creates stronger accountability, and we were very excited earlier this summer
to publish the first-ever CMS Medicaid & CHIP Scorecard.
If you haven't had a chance to
take a look at that yet I strongly suggest you do. We’ve had about 14 states
that have spent six months working diligently with us on crafting this
version of the Scorecard.
In addition to displaying health
outcome and quality metrics in areas like well-child visits and chronic
health conditions, you’ll see for the first time public reporting on our administrative
performance.
This includes both state and
federal performance measures in areas like the speed of processing managed
care rate reviews or state plan amendments. Soon the scorecard will begin to
reflect some of the real progress we are making on this front. For example,
between 2016 and the first quarter of 2018, we saw a 23% drop in the average
approval time for Medicaid state plan changes.
84% of those requested changes
were approved within the first 90-day period in the first quarter of 2018, a
20% increase over 2016.
And over that same time period,
the average time to approve renewals for home and community based waivers
decreased by 38%.
And this version of the Scorecard
is only the first step in this project. We are already hard at work on the
next iteration, which we hope to update annually with new features and
expanded measures. Future updates will include additions like the ability to
generate year-to-year comparisons and understand differences in state and
regional performance.
We are also working to develop
more measures, including ones that look at the areas of cost, program
integrity, and beneficiary satisfaction. And, I’d be remiss, if I didn’t
mention a group to whom we should hold ourselves accountable for serving
better – and that is the 12 million Americans who are dually eligible for
Medicaid and Medicare. It’s essential that we give states and health plans
the tools to better integrate the full array of services these individuals
rely on.
It is particularly critical that
we address this given the facts that dually eligible individuals are among
our most expensive beneficiaries for both programs. Despite accounting for
20% of Medicare enrollees and 15% of Medicaid enrollees, they consume 34% of
Medicare spending and 33% of Medicaid spending, respectively.
Less than 10% of duals are
enrolled in any form of integrated care, and instead have to navigate alone
across disconnected delivery and payment systems to get the care they need.
We have to change that.
Earlier this year Congress challenged
us to do more to promote integrated care through dual eligible special needs
plans. Our work is well underway. In the coming year, we will support new
models and opportunities for additional states to test innovations to better
serve this population. Additionally, we will challenge ourselves and the
states to be better business partners to health plans and providers. The
administrative burdens and inefficiencies to serving dually eligible
beneficiaries are unacceptable. It’s time to achieve a level of operational
excellence that older Americans deserve.
Which brings us to our final
pillar: Program Integrity.
Federal spending on Medicaid has
ballooned, growing by over $100 billion between 2013 and 2016, and it often
sits at the number 1 or 2 spot in state budgets. We have a responsibility to
make sure that taxpayer dollars are spent only on qualified services for
those who are truly eligible, even as we return greater control of the
Medicaid program to the states.
And just last week, CMS’
independent Office of the Actuary released their financial report on the
Medicaid program. It confirmed, what we have already known for quite some
time – that our healthcare spending, particularly in Medicaid is forecasted
to grow at an alarming pace. Since Day One, my top priority has been to
ensure programs, such as Medicaid, will always be around to serve those that
truly need the program, and that means slowing the growth of spending.
Additionally, in June we launched
our new Medicaid Program Integrity strategy that will bring CMS into a new
era of enhancing the accountability of how we manage taxpayer dollars. This
strategy includes several important new initiatives:
First, we will take a close
review of State eligibility determinations. And second, we will take steps to
strengthen our oversight of state financial claiming and rate setting.
We are also working to build a
stronger regulatory framework to ensure transparency and accountability in
Medicaid supplemental payments, with a particular emphasis on promoting
integrity in the equity partnership we share with states by ensuring that
states put up their fair share of state matching funds only from permissible
sources.
Transparency must also extend to
our health plan partners. This room understands well that nearly all newly
eligible individuals in Medicaid are served through managed care
organizations. I’m putting you on notice now - CMS will begin targeted audits
to ensure that provider claims for actual health care spending matches what
the health plans are reporting financially.
Finally, we are working to
strengthen how we use data in the oversight of the program.
For the first time, every state,
D.C., and Puerto Rico are now submitting data on their programs to the
Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System (known as T-MSIS), and
over the course of the coming months we will be validating the quality and
completeness of that data, so that its use for program integrity purposes can
be expanded and realized, including plans to release analytic files for
research purposes beginning next year.
And as a part of our
MyHealthEData Initiative, we have called on everyone who holds patient data,
whether it be hospitals, insurers, or Medicaid Managed Care Plans, to give
patients control of their records, so that they can be the chief drivers of
value in our healthcare system.
I truly believe that best ideas,
attuned to the distinct needs of local communities, come from those
communities - not DC.
And I greatly appreciate the role
that our health plan partners play in delivering quality care to Medicaid
beneficiaries all across the country. I have seen firsthand the value that
you bring to your partnership with states, and the resources that you can
often bring to bear to serve the needs of our enrollees on the front lines.
We must continue to work
together, allowing state innovation to drive improvements in services. We
must foster greater collaboration among…and between…state agencies,
providers, advocates, and beneficiaries - to chart a path forward - because
we recognize that what works in Montana won't be a good fit for Rhode Island,
but we can all learn from our individual and shared experiences.
But I have said before and I will
say it again - until we move away from an open ended entitlement program, and
only when states are held accountable to a defined budget - can the federal
government finally end our practice of micromanaging every administrative
process. I believe that it’s our imperative to instead focus on measuring the
actual results on the program while unleashing the power of local innovation
- so you will see more from us soon on new opportunities to do just that. So
stay tuned.
We want every individual to have
the opportunity to achieve earned success, and we must encourage every
American to strive for better health and well-being. These efforts must be
supported, evaluated, and shared – not shunned. Prosperity can never be
handed out as a government benefit, but our programs can play an important
part in helping people get off the sidelines of American life and find
independence and a sense of purpose. Thank you.
###
Get CMS
news at cms.gov/newsroom, sign up for CMS news via email and follow CMS on Twitter CMS
Administrator @SeemaCMS, @CMSgov, and @CMSgovPress.
|
To be a Medicare Agent's source of information on topics affecting the agent and their business, and most importantly, their clientele, is the intention of this site. Sourced from various means rooted in the health insurance industry - insurance carriers, governmental agencies, and industry news agencies, this is aimed as a resource of varying viewpoints to spark critical thought and discussion. We welcome your contributions.
Thursday, September 27, 2018
Remarks by Administrator Seema Verma at the 2018 Medicaid Managed Care Summit
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment