Drew Altman, Kaiser
Family Foundation Oct 10,2018
Reproduced
from a Kaiser Family Foundation report; Chart: Axios Visuals
The conventional wisdom is that corporate America has a renewed,
almost crisis-level concern about rising health costs. But, in a puzzle I am
struggling to solve, the data don’t suggest a basis for a new level of urgency
about health costs in corporate America.
Why it matters: In
fact, just the opposite is true. There's just not that much change — so any
solution that's designed for a crisis will probably miss the mark or could
unnecessarily harm workers.
The big picture: As
Axios has recently reported in Vitals, employer health costs
are eating up a larger share of overall compensation that they did 20 years
ago. But as this chart shows, over the last 10 years, health costs as a
percentage of overall compensation for larger employers — the ones that are
most outspoken on the issue — have moved in a narrow band, between 8 and 9
percent of total compensation.
- For all private
employers, it has remained between 7 and 8 percent of compensation over
the same period.
- Premium growth
has also been modest — in the 3 to 4 percent
a year range — and is not likely to
jump in 2019. There is no question that workers are
feeling the pain of out-of-pocket costs, but that’s a different problem.
Between the lines: There
may be a few explanations for the perception of a health cost crisis in the corporate
world. Employers have held costs down, in part, by shifting them to
employees. They may now feel cost shifting is nearing a natural limit.
They get blowback about it from their employees, and most have
always seen cost shifting as an expedient way to shave their annual premium
increase rather than as a meaningful cost containment strategy.
- Even if health
costs have not been growing recently as a percentage of wages, there still
can be sticker shock, with the average cost of a family policy around $19,000 per year, about the cost of
a Honda Civic. Plus, health benefits still consume 7.5% of overall
compensation for private sector employers — a significant share, though
far less than wages (69.6%).
- The averages
also conceal the fact that some employers are getting hit harder than
others.
What we've seen in recent years in our employer survey is
largely business as usual, with most employers deploying a grab bag of cost
strategies, from cost shifting to disease management to wellness programs and
more, without expressing great confidence in any one strategy. That approach is
more consistent with the data showing the burden of health costs largely stable
with moderate cost growth.
The
bottom line: The data on corporate health costs are at odds with the rhetoric
of a crisis or the sense that employers are poised to take dramatic action.
Please let me know what I am missing.
No comments:
Post a Comment