Oct. 17, 2018
Dive Brief:
- Sutter Health has subpoenaed pricing
information for 50 California hospitals in response to a lawsuit that
accuses the Sacramento-based system of antitrust practices.
- The other
hospitals have pushed back on the request, saying the information is
proprietary.
- Amy Thoma Tan, Sutter Health
spokesperson, told Healthcare Dive in a statement on Tuesday that Sutter's
request is "common in antitrust litigation."
Dive
Insight:
California
Attorney General Xavier Becerra filed a lawsuit against
Sutter earlier this year that alleged the system uses its market power in
Northern California to charge higher prices.
Spokeswoman Thoma
Tan said the lawsuit "gets the facts wrong and mischaracterizes how Sutter
serves patients and communities as a not-for-profit organization in the
competitive Northern California healthcare environment."
In
response to the lawsuit, Sutter requested the contracting information from
competing hospitals between 2000 and 2012. Competitors like El Camino
Hospital and Good Samaritan protested the request.
Thoma
Tan said Sutter will use the information about the broader healthcare
marketplace to defend itself.
"The
court has agreed that contracts and pricing from other hospitals are relevant
in the case, and while Sutter won't ever see this information, in order to
defend ourselves and demonstrate that the plaintiffs' claims are false, this
information provides important evidence of the actual prices in California and
the contracting terms commonly used in the industry. Sutter will use the
information to provide an accurate picture of what the healthcare industry
really looks like in California," Thoma Tan said.
This
case comes after researchers at University of
California-Berkeley found earlier this year that
healthcare costs in Northern California are much higher than Southern
California. The report estimated 30% higher costs in the northern part of
the state, where Sutter has consolidated market power.
This
lawsuit involving Sutter goes beyond one region and competing health systems.
It also highlights national issues like lack of price transparency and how
consolidation can affect prices. Publishing hospital prices are one way to
improve transparency and consumerism. However, as this case shows, hospitals
may not want to provide that information, which they deem proprietary.
With
that in mind, California approved legislation this
year that aims to improve hospital pricing data. The plan will create a
database with pricing information from health insurance companies about
inpatient stays, procedures and medical services. It's expected to roll out by
2023.
The
case also goes to the broader M&A trend, which remains red hot. PricewaterhouseCoopers said
the second quarter of the year was the 15th in a row with more than 200
healthcare M&A deals. That might be good for the facilities involved,
but it might actually contribute to higher costs. The Commonwealth Fund recently
said providers are consolidating faster than payers.
If
the trend continues, Deloitte predicted
that only half of the current health systems will still be around in the next
decade.
No comments:
Post a Comment