By Emmarie
Huetteman September
28, 2018
For
years, congressional Republicans have vowed to repeal the Affordable Care Act.
Now, in a case sending shock waves through midterm election campaigns,
Republican attorneys general across the country may be poised to make good on
that promise.
The
case, Texas v. United States, reveals just how high the stakes
are for health care in this year’s attorney general races, elections that
rarely receive much attention but have the power to reverberate through the
lives of Americans.
“It
just shows that nothing is safe,” said Xavier Becerra, California’s attorney
general, who is leading 16 states and the District of Columbia in defending the
ACA in the case.
Both
parties expect record-breaking fundraising for this year’s 30 contested
elections for state attorneys general. Democrats aim to translate public
outrage over the threat to the ACA into the votes needed to seize a handful of
posts currently held by Republicans.
This
will be the first major election since Republicans tore up a deal
brokered with Democrats roughly two decades ago not to challenge each other’s
incumbents in attorney general races. That gentlemen’s agreement acknowledged
the need for attorneys general from both parties to collaborate on
investigations and lawsuits.
But
some of the same partisan forces that have embittered Capitol Hill have spilled
into these contests. With Republicans in control of the executive and
legislative branches — and close to staking their claim on the Supreme Court —
Democratic attorneys general are seen as a check on Trump administration policies.
Similarly, their Republican counterparts frequently took the Obama
administration to court.
That
pressure is likely to increase should congressional Democrats fail to win
control of at least one chamber of Congress in November.
Raphael
Sonenshein, the executive director of California State University’s Pat Brown
Institute for Public Affairs in Los Angeles, compared the politics invigorating
state attorneys general to a bar brawl.
“Two
people have a fight, and then it spills out into the street, and 20 people join
in,” he said. “Everybody gets off the bench and joins the fight.”
A
banner on the Democratic Attorneys General Association’s website captures
their mindset, while states are busy challenging the Trump administration on
issues like sanctuary cities and family separations at the border: “This office
has never been more important.”
Former
Vice President Joe Biden recently endorsed six
attorney general candidates in races Democrats think they can win, including
Ohio and Wisconsin, and the association plans to raise a record-breaking $15
million for November’s elections, said Lizzie Ulmer, a spokeswoman for the
group.
By
mid-June, the Republican Attorneys General Association had raised $26.6 million,
continuing to break its fundraising records.
Of this
year’s 30 contested attorney general races, 18 posts are held by Republicans
and 12 are held by Democrats. (Another five are in play this year, but those
posts are appointed by the governor or state lawmakers.)
Unlike
in Congress, there is no inherent advantage to one party claiming the majority
of attorneys general posts. It takes just one attorney general to file a
lawsuit.
But
Democratic attorneys general see themselves as a firewall against an
administration and their Republican counterparts dead set on revoking many
federal protections. In that arena, every lawyer counts.
That is
especially the case with health care, where fights over issues like access to
abortion have multiplied since President Donald Trump took office, with others
liable to end up in the courts at any time.
California’s
Becerra, who is running in November against Republican Steven Bailey, a
retired Superior Court judge, has filed several lawsuits since taking over last yearfor
former Attorney General Kamala Harris, after she was elected to the U.S.
Senate.
In
addition to his lead role defending the ACA in the Texas lawsuit, Becerra
succeeded in temporarily blocking the federal government from denying access to birth control nationwide.
He also filed a lawsuit against Sutter Health,
accusing the Northern California health care system of overcharging patients
and pushing out competition. And he joined 12 states in a lawsuit against a federal rule that opens
the door to health plans that are not subject to consumer protections under the
ACA.
Earlier
this month, a federal judge heard arguments in the Texas case on the
constitutionality of the individual mandate, the ACA’s requirement that all
Americans obtain health insurance or pay a penalty.
Citing
the law passed late last year that eliminated the penalty, the plaintiffs — a
Texas-led coalition of 20 states and two individuals — argued the individual
mandate was now unconstitutional. By extension, so was the rest of the ACA,
they said. They asked for a preliminary injunction that could halt the sweeping
ACA in its tracks — including popular provisions such as protections for people
with preexisting conditions.
Ken
Paxton, the attorney general of Texas, has defended his decision to challenge
protections that have broad support, including among Republicans, saying he has
a duty to fight laws that harm Texans and defy the U.S. Constitution.
“The
least compassionate thing we could do for those with preexisting health
problems is to take away their access to high-quality care from doctors of
their own choosing and place them entirely at the mercy of the federal
government,” Matt Welch, Paxton’s campaign spokesman, said in a statement.
But the
idea that insurers would no longer have to cover those with preexisting
conditions has proven explosive, offering Democrats a powerful rallying cry
beyond even attorney general races. In Missouri and West Virginia, states that
Trump won in 2016 but are represented by Democratic senators, the issue
has followed the Republican attorneys general
— Missouri’s Josh Hawley and West Virginia’s Patrick Morrisey — as they run for
Senate.
“We’re
wasting millions and millions of dollars of taxpayer money trying to take away
preexisting condition protections not just for all Texans but all Americans,”
said Justin Nelson, Paxton’s Democratic challenger, who said he would withdraw
Texas from the case should he win his long-shot bid.
In
Wisconsin, the Republican attorney general, Brad Schimel, has also taken a
leading role in Texas v. United States, as well as a 2016
challenge to a landmark Obama administration rule banning discrimination in
health care based on a patient’s gender identity, among other cases.
This
year, Schimel has drawn a formidable Democratic challenger, Josh Kaul. He’s a
former assistant U.S. attorney who prosecuted federal drug crimes and has
promised to focus on the state’s backlog of untested rape kits and take a more
aggressive approach to the opioid epidemic. “We’re not going to beat that
without ensuring our efforts are targeting large-scale drug traffickers,” he
said.
Experts
caution a changing of the guard would not spell the end of a big case
like Texas v. United States. For instance, even if Paxton were
to defy expectations and lose, Texas’ legal and financial backing for the case
could easily be picked up by another state.
However,
the message voters would send by electing a Democratic attorney general in
Texas — where no Democrat has won statewide office since 1994 — could have
profound implications for Republican morale.
“Without
Ken Paxton leading the charge, many Republicans may soften their opposition to
Obamacare,” said Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor at the
University of Houston.
This story was produced
by Kaiser Health News, an editorially
independent program of the Kaiser Family
Foundation.
Emmarie Huetteman: ehuetteman@kff.org,
@emmarieDC
https://californiahealthline.org/news/threat-to-the-aca-turns-up-the-heat-on-attorney-general-races/?utm_campaign=CHL%3A%20Weekly%20Edition&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=66289667&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8bqBOFgG_vBHT3L_s6Y4lTuqWcmehv5TLCXnvhr9Wil_PjTfka5mUOmuvGr2lwrQ-7Y0yJLyEZ4DomtXOSGKpFqfGBqg&_hsmi=66289667
No comments:
Post a Comment