Monday, January 13, 2020

Why Won’t Patients Embrace Portals?


by Paul Nardone | January 07, 2020
recent study tracked patients in 12 health systems across the country for 9 months (March – December 2018) and found that just 0.7% of patient portal users also downloaded their health record data using their phones (accounting for 0.1% of all health system patients, assuming standard adoption rates of the patient portals within those health systems).
Healthcare organizations (HCOs) and their vendors may be missing an opportunity to better engage patients if they ignore their portals and obsess over app downloads and adoption. If vendors make patient portals more palatable to patients, more enthusiastic app adoption could follow. Ensuring patients can easily access and utilize patient portals makes those patients more likely to use patient portal-adjacent offerings. However, patients continue to find portals hard to navigate and difficult to learn. This blog post will offer solutions for addressing each issue, hopefully allowing patients to benefit from the portals that provider organizations are working so hard to build.
User Experience
Because smartphone users tracked by the study were all previous users of a patient portal, a less than stellar experience with the patient portal may have dissuaded patients from exploring other online offerings from the same provider. Standards for patient-facing health-IT tools are rising as health apps improve their functionality and user experience. For instance, Apple Health presents users with easily navigable, well-presented health data. Conversely, most portals greet patients with inadequate functionalityconfusing formatting, and hard to understand health data. Patients often lose interest in these portals, unsure of how to take advantage of any of their promised offerings.
To address these issues, designers of patient portals need to follow principles of interaction design. Patient portals should present a streamlined, intuitive user interface that enables patients to quickly and easily find and manage their data. Information should be readable and actionable; instead of simply indicating “high LDL” when presenting numeric blood work results, which many patients would not know how to interpret or use, portals should explain how a patient’s high cholesterol is impacting their health and link resources to healthy lifestyle adaptations right there in the app. Smartphone applications on small screens can easily become cluttered, but the same interaction design principles apply. User testing can determine if attempts to meet these criteria were successful, as well as identify additional areas of potential improvement.
Learning How and Why to Use the Portal
Patients also need more help navigating portals. A previous study revealed that many patients received no help beyond being informed of the existence of the patient portal website (if they had been made aware of its existence at all). When asked, patients described learning to use the portal as a “trial and error” process or stated that they “played around with it” until they figured it out. No patient reported having someone explain how to use the portal or what the benefits of using the portal might be.
Adding simple automated tutorials to the patient portal after an initial login, providing a phone number to call for guidance, or offering in-person assistance at a provider’s office for those struggling to use the portal could help patients take advantage of what the portal offers.
Visibility
Unenthusiastic providers may not even tell patients that a portal exists, with one provider stating, “there was an incentive to get so many people signed up so we were trying to talk to everybody initially but not any more so I kind of leave it up to them if they’re interested in that.” Without outside marketing, most people would be unlikely to use or learn about a patient portal until a care episode, if at all.
Many other healthcare stakeholders already provide strategies for marketing patient portals (the ONC even has a patient engagement playbook that covers the topic), but most boil down to improving outreach and having office staff commit to patient portal enrollment. Encouragement by all members of the office staff (doctors, nurses, management staff, etc.), advertisements in the office, and regular e-mail outreach to patients that are not signed up for the patient portal are all examples of these strategies.
Conclusions
The study I linked to above about portals should not be surprising. It is unlikely that patients who had already struggled to figure out how to use a patient portal would take extra steps to learn and use an associated smartphone app. However, the importance of addressing these issues cannot be understated. Providing and utilizing patient portals has been proven to improve patients’ health status. Interest in expanding the use of smartphones to connect patients and providers has been growing for many years. So, healthcare stakeholders should push for these issues to be addressed, allowing patients, providers, and payers to reap the benefits that patient portals could enable.


No comments:

Post a Comment