Eakinomics:
Beware Senators Bearing Gifts
Senator Elizabeth Warren, charter member of the academic and ruling
elites but self-styled crusader for the average guy, is out to save you
(again). The problem: America’s
corporations. In the good old days, "Corporations sought to succeed
in the marketplace, but they also recognized their obligations to
employees, customers and the community." Now, however, the
ethic has changed so that "corporate
directors ha[ve] only one obligation: to maximize shareholder
returns." The result? "In the four decades after World War II,
shareholders on net contributed more than $250 billion to U.S. companies.
But since 1985 they have extracted almost $7 trillion. That’s
trillions of dollars in profits that might otherwise have been reinvested
in the workers who helped produce them."
What is her solution? The Accountable Capitalism Act (ACA, hmmmmm…where
have I seen that acronym before?). As she explains it:
"The Accountable Capitalism Act restores the idea that giant
American corporations should look out for American interests.
Corporations with more than $1 billion in annual revenue would be
required to get a federal corporate charter. The new charter requires
corporate directors to consider the interests of all major
corporate stakeholders—not only shareholders—in company
decisions."
Let's ignore the shaky foundation of non-facts on which her indictment of
the current situation is built and cut to the chase. This makes no sense
in ways small and large.
In the small, she argues that corporations shouldn't be responsible
solely to shareholders, but rather to all stakeholders. But what is the
stick behind the ACA? "Shareholders could sue if they believed
directors weren’t fulfilling those obligations." Huh? She also
misses the point that corporations are subject to an enormous array of
labor, workplace, environmental, product safety, and other regulations
that are de facto accountability
mechanisms for those other stakeholders.
But she really just misses the big picture: If this is what people want,
market forces will deliver it! If you want to support only
environmentally acceptable operations, there's a fund for that. Hate
those firms invested in countries with human rights violations? Divest
and boycott their products. Want to support social investing — there's a
fund for that, too. If treatment of stakeholders is important, those
values get transmitted in the products people choose to buy, the jobs
they are apt to take, and the investments they are willing to make.
Indeed, Warren undercuts herself by pointing out, "This approach
follows the 'benefit corporation' model, which gives businesses fiduciary
responsibilities beyond their shareholders….And successful companies such
as Patagonia and Kickstarter have embraced this role."
Exactly.
It is extremely dangerous to move toward embedding decisions over those
values in the government. Whose values would we get then? Those
who favor top-down, government-instilled morality seemingly believe that
the government is controlled by angels.
Hardly.
My guess is that this is largely empty political posturing. But it feeds
a dangerous meme that somehow we just have to get back to the good old
days. I grew up in the '50s and '60s. Other than the blatant sexism,
blatant racism, riots, political assassinations, threat of nuclear
annihilation, Western colonialism, Cold War, and a few other details, it
was great. The economy prospered because it could not help but
prosper — the rest of the world was digging out of the rubble of
World War II. Being a global monopolist is a great gig if you can get it,
but those days are over. Senator Warren is just like President Trump in
longing for the easy affluence of that age, without having a clue how to
reproduce it in the era in which we actually live.
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment