Eakinomics:
The Economic Ravages of the Opioid Epidemic
The human toll of the opioid epidemic is staggering. As documented by AAF’s Ben Gitis,
in 2017, 47,872 Americans died from opioid-related overdoses. Since
1999 annual opioid overdose fatalities have risen by 10 percent per year,
and the most recent data show an acceleration to 16 percent in 2015 and
28 percent in 2016. Early in the crisis, overdoses were dominated by
abuse of prescription opioids. Efforts to control over-prescribing and
other excessive access to those drugs, however, produced a shift after
2010 to rapidly rising deaths from illegal sources — heroin and synthetic
opioids.
Any demographic phenomenon this large simply has to have economic
consequences, but policymakers have been slow to recognize these impacts.
In other work (as revised), Gitis
finds that between 1999 and 2015, opioid dependency reduced the prime-age
male and female labor force participation rates by 1.4 percentage points
and 1.8 percentage points, respectively. The upshot is that
in 2015 slightly more than 2 million prime-age individuals were not
in the labor force because of opioids, which represents a loss of $1.6
trillion in total economic activity.
As it turns out, however, the losses are not evenly distributed across
the nation. In his most recent work — published in
the Washington Post and today presented in testimony to the
House Small Business Committee — he shows that the impact on labor force
participation and economic growth varies considerably by state (see this
cool map). The most negative impacts are
in West Virginia and Arkansas, where prime-age labor force participation
is 3.8 percentage points lower (with a corresponding decline in economic
output). The epidemic had substantial impacts on prime-age
participation in Missouri (3.0 percentage points), Georgia (2.9
percentage points), New York (2.9 percentage points), and Kentucky
(2.8 percentage points).
The opioid epidemic is a stark reminder that the most important economic
asset is a nation’s labor force. U.S. policies on health,
education, immigration, and other areas should be focused on the future
of the labor force.
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment