A review by Johns Hopkins contends previous
research was biased
By Considerable
Staff • July 26, 2019
Caregiving for a
family member is stressful and can be emotionally
overwhelming. But is it harmful to your physical
health?
New research into
the inflammation levels and immune systems of caregivers by Johns Hopkins
suggests otherwise. The findings were published
in The Gerontologist.
To reach their
conclusion, the team took a fresh look at 30 studies stretching from 1987 to
2016 that examined specific molecular biomarkers in the blood that indicate
inflammation and immune deficiencies.
The studies included
data from 1,848 caregivers and 3,640 non-caregivers.
The physical ailments associated with caregiving were barely
statistically relevant.
What they found was
surprising: The frequency of physical ailments previously associated with
caregiving were barely statistically relevant.
The team maintains
individual studies that point to an increase in those biomarkers based their
conclusions on weak statistical correlations because of low sample sizes or
high bias ratings.
“We’re not saying
that family caregiving can’t be stressful, but there’s a notion that it’s so
stressful that it causes deteriorating health and increased mortality. This can
lead to fear of caregiving and a reluctance to care for loved ones in need,”
said first author David Roth,
director of the Center on Aging and Health at Johns Hopkins. “We’re challenging
that narrative as being too exaggerated.”
The team hopes the study will ease concerns of caregivers.
While caregiving did
seem to boost those biomarkers by a modest 0.164 standard deviation units, Roth
said, “it’s a whisper of an effect, not nearly as large as what people have
been led to believe.”
In fact, the Johns
Hopkins team hopes the study will ease
concerns of caregivers that their own bodies will be
compromised by supporting a family member.
“Caregiving, if done
right, can actually be an extremely beneficial, healthy activity that enhances
your life because you’re engaging in pro-social behavior,” Roth said.
No comments:
Post a Comment