Christopher Holt July 12, 2019
Late
Wednesday, news broke that the Trump Administration was withdrawing a
controversial proposed rule that would have altered how drugs are paid for in
the Medicare Part D program. There
is much to say about the potential merits and challenges of the proposed rebate rule, but the administration’s decision
to abandon it is perhaps more important for what it signals about where the
drug pricing debate is headed.
While the
rebate rule would have been a significant change in Medicare policy with a host
of implications for all stakeholders—manufacturers, insurers, the federal
government, pharmacy benefit managers, and beneficiaries—it was still limited
in scope. The rule would have likely increased premiums moderately for all Part
D plans, while providing steep discounts to some patients who are prescribed
especially high cost medications. The proposal was also projected to increase federal
spending—though how much weight to give to those estimates is unclear, and
something AAF has contemplated here, here, and here. The bottom line, however, is that the policy itself made sense in that it
would have spread risk more equitably across the pool of beneficiaries.
Yet—and here’s the rub—any effects were largely
limited to the Part D program, and it probably wouldn’t have had a notable
impact on drug list prices.
President Trump has been clear that he is laser focused on the
issue of drug list prices. In October 2017 the president said, “Prescription drug prices
are out of control. The drug prices have gone through the roof. The drug
companies, frankly, are getting away with murder.” In his 2018 State of
the Union address, Trump pledged to make “fixing the injustice of high drug
prices one of our top priorities for the year. And prices will come down
substantially. Watch.” While it might have been good policy, the rebate rule wouldn’t have achieved the
president’s goal of bringing down list prices. Further, the rebate rule
faced opposition from Congress as well as from inside the White House, due to
the political implications of increasing seniors’ Part D premiums.
The pressure to do something (really, anything) to
bring down drug prices isn’t going away. With the rebate rule
off the table, there will be renewed focus on finalizing the even more
controversial—and misguided—International Price Index proposal, which
would set prices for Medicare Part B drugs at a rate based on an index of what
other countries pay for those drugs. Further, President Trump’s commitment to
lower drug prices means that Republicans, and especially those in the White
House, will feel an increasing need to reach a deal with House Democrats on
legislation reducing drug prices.
All these policy roads seem to be leading toward
expanded federal government intervention in the drug marketplace, a policy path
Republicans have historically been loath to tread. But across the health
care space, both Democrats and now Republicans seem eager to involve further
the government in matters that have traditionally been left to the private
sector: see Senate and House legislative proposals (detailed by AAF’s Jonathan
Keisling here) aimed at dictating how hospitals,
insurers, and physicians should handle “surprise” medical bills.
Health
care in America isn’t by any means a “free” market. Even before the Affordable
Care Act, there were simply too many federal-policy shackles on the various
stakeholders to pretend it was an unfettered marketplace. And arguably, health
care shouldn’t be left entirely to unrestricted market forces. At the same time, the federal government has
historically approached market intervention, even in health care, from the
perspective that markets work and that government direction of the economy
should be limited. It’s exactly this philosophy that led to a successful Part D program.
Do we still believe markets generally work, and that
market forces lead to better outcomes? The fact that the
health care market is not a completely free market does not mean we should
actively erode market forces, but unfortunately, that seems to be where
policymakers are heading.
https://www.americanactionforum.org/weekly-checkup/where-does-it-go-from-here-drug-pricing-policy-after-the-rebate-rule-reversal/#ixzz5uRxh3884
Follow @AAF on Twitter
https://www.americanactionforum.org/weekly-checkup/where-does-it-go-from-here-drug-pricing-policy-after-the-rebate-rule-reversal/#ixzz5uRxh3884
Follow @AAF on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment