By Matthew
Klein | Friday, July 10
Hope Springs Eternal. Remdesivir, the antiviral drug manufactured by
Gilead Sciences might lower the fatality rate of COVID-19, at least
according to a new analysis from Gilead that wasn’t based on actual
clinical trials. The news pushed stocks steadily
higher throughout the day, with the largest gains in some of the most
virus-sensitive sectors: cruise lines, airlines, oil refiners, and banks. Tech
and pharma stocks were the relative laggards.
While stocks
were up, traders weren’t exactly enthusiastic. According to our colleagues at Dow
Jones Market Data, total stock trading volume
today on the NYSE and Nasdaq
was the lowest it’s been since
Feb. 21—just after the S&P 500 index peaked and well before investors started
worrying about the impact of coronavirus.
The caution
makes sense: While an effective antiviral treatment would undoubtedly be good
news, for now we still have to deal with the reality of an outbreak that
continues to spiral out of control. Over 50,000 Americans are currently hospitalized with the virus, almost
double the number in mid-June.
If investors
are bored of paying attention to the virus, perhaps they should start focusing
more on trade policy. Contrary to what some in Beijing and Brussels may have
hoped, it looks as if American economic nationalism is here to stay regardless
of who wins in November.
“American
workers can out-compete anyone, but their government needs to fight for them,”
according to a new plan to reinvigorate domestic manufacturing from
Democrat Joe Biden. His proposal
is a mix of government support for research and development, additional
spending on U.S.-made goods, changes to tax incentives that currently encourage
companies to move production abroad, and new procurement rules meant to favor
American producers, among other things.
Also notable
is active
support for “rebuilding domestic manufacturing of critical products
to ensure that the U.S. and our allies have the capacity and resilience to make
what we need for our national security, rather than be dependent on countries
like China.” If enacted, the program would be a significant departure from the
bipartisan consensus of the past several decades, which held that America had
supposedly transcended the grubby work of making physical things and had become
a “service economy.”
Meanwhile, President Trump laid to rest any hopes of an improved trade
relationship with China, telling reporters today that the “phase two” deal was no longer on the agenda. The “phase one”
agreement—negotiated before the pandemic—was a set of ambitious promises by
Chinese state-run companies to buy more American exports. Phase two was
supposed to address the underlying problems with Chinese economic policy,
without which the purchase agreement would be useless. Unsurprisingly, the
current pace of purchases is hopelessly behind schedule thanks to the
virus. Expect things to get worse before they get better.
Watch our TV
show on Fox Business Friday at 10 p.m. or 11:30 p.m. ET; Saturday at 10 a.m. or
11:30 a.m.; or Sunday at 7 a.m., 10 a.m. or 11:30 a.m. This week, see an
interview with Adena T. Friedman,
president and CEO of Nasdaq, on
what's ahead for that tech-driven market. Plus, Thomas
Michaud, president and CEO of Keefe,
Bruyette & Woods, joins a
discussion of what to expect when big banks report earnings.
No comments:
Post a Comment