If the insured controls the separate account, the insured owns
the account, a GAO director says.
A U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) team is telling
Congress that taxpayers can abuse private placement variable life insurance.
The GAO team looked at the product for Sen. Charles Grassley,
R-Iowa, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee. The team focused on
two types of offshore insurance: micro-captive insurers controlled by U.S.
businesses, and private placement variable life insurance.
Jessica Lucas-Judy, a GAO director, wrote in a report on the GAO
team’s findings that there are many legitimate uses for offshore life insurance
products.
But an Internal Revenue Service official said “offshore variable
life insurance products have been used to conceal assets from the U.S.
government, including undeclared assets at risk of being discovered during
investigations of foreign banks,” Lucas-Judy wrote in the report. “Further,
some taxpayers closely control how their premiums are invested and may direct
premium funds toward illiquid assets they currently own in an attempt to
convert taxable income to tax-exempt income that is eventually passed on to
their beneficiaries tax-free.”
Resources
·
An
article about an IRS regulation effort that referred to private placement
life insurance and annuity products is available here.
The IRS has been clashing with taxpayers and their tax advisors
over offshore insurance arrangements for years. The GAO prepared the report
partly to summarize the history of IRS efforts to police offshore
insurance arrangements.
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed in May to take up an offshore
captive insurance case, CIC Services v. IRS. The case hinges on a question
about rules governing legal challenges to regulatory mandates that are not
taxes, rather than on insurance tax rules.
In 2019, Lucas-Judy wrote, prosecutors won a criminal case
involving a taxpayer who failed to file reports on a foreign financial account
associated with a Swiss private placement variable life insurance policy.
In another case, a Tax Court judge determined “that the taxpayer
had significant control over the assets held in the foreign financial account
associated with his offshore private placement variable life insurance
policies,” according to Lucas-Judy. “As a result, the court held that the
taxpayer was the owner of that account for federal income tax purposes, and any
income from the assets was includable in the taxpayer’s gross income.”
That taxpayer, an investment manager and the offshore insurer
exchanged more than 70,000 emails about the variable life policies’ investment
accounts, and the taxpayer directed the assets toward startups and other
companies in which he had a financial interest, according to Lucas-Judy.
No comments:
Post a Comment