The
Trump administration touts its recent release of final regulations expanding
employers' flexibility in offering health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) to
their employees as promoting more consumer choice and likely to cover more
uninsured workers.
Under
the regulations, starting on Jan. 1, 2020, employers will be able to offer
stand-alone HRAs to help certain employees buy individual health insurance
policies. Or they may offer "excepted-benefit" HRAs to reimburse
employees for certain medical expenses with annual employer contributions of up
to $1,800.
"Philosophically,
it's a big change, giving employees flexibility to go out on the [individual]
market and find coverage," says Nicole Tapay, principal at Avalere Health.
"I think in the near term you'll see most likely the small employers will
be giving it a closer look, [deciding] whether they want to use this
flexibility to give them more predictability on costs." Insurers offering
coverage in the individual market "may see it as an opportunity," she
says, while those offering group plans may want to tweak their offerings over
time to anticipate employer shifts.
The HRA
regulations come with guardrails to protect the individual market.
"Opponents will say [these regulations] will cause employers to dump their
older and sicker workers onto the individual market," says Dorian Smith,
national practice leader for Mercer’s law and policy group, "while
proponents will say there are guardrails."
Smith
notes Mercer's clients generally are larger employers, most of whom have
already decided on their 2020 offerings and would need to provide 90-day notice
of changes for calendar year plans.
But for
mid-2020 or calendar year 2021, "they might consider [HRAs] for certain
employees, like part-time workers not eligible for the group health plan….It
still provides a way to offer something different from the employer across the
street."
From Health Plan Weekly
No comments:
Post a Comment