by Richard Hamer 21-Sep-2020
Medicare Advantage plans
have emerged as a top opportunity for health insurers. Favorable regulations,
and seniors’ increasing recognition of MA value have led most observers to
forecast continuing enrollment growth for many years to come.
In recent years, major
players such as United Healthcare, Humana, Cigna, and Aetna have put great
resources toward building their Medicare Advantage enrollment. In this case,
our client is a regional player facing competition from some of the national
giants as well as local Blues and other health plans.
The competition has
generated more consumer switching. Maintaining and increasing enrollment
is more challenging.
Knowing that failing to
be as strong as possible in the Medicare Advantage market will inhibit its
strategic progress in many areas, Deft’s client wants to understand which
combinations of benefits and out-of-pocket costs are most attractive to
seniors. They need to see what will attract consumers “aging in” to
Medicare (at age 65) and those already in Medicare and looking to improve their
health benefits.
The Research Approach
For many years, Deft
Research has been a leader in developing conjoint analysis for health
insurance. Conjoint analysis was chosen for this project because it leads to
estimates of the consumer value of both benefits and out-of-pocket costs. The
estimates were combined to enable our client to see how consumer “shares of
preference” are distributed among different benefit designs and competitor
brands.
Conjoint analysis is
considered the gold standard among research methods when the client's key
questions are about developing successful products and moving on market
opportunities.
Because one conjoint
analysis can’t address all questions, Deft incorporated into the survey a
similar but simpler research technique known as Max-Diff to
capture the consumer value of a new array of supplemental benefits made
possible for Medicare Advantage by regulatory changes that took effect in 2019.
The measures of benefit
design were varied.
·
Costs to the consumer: premium,
maximum out of pocket, hospitalization costs, outpatient surgery, advanced
imaging, and so on.
·
Ancillary Benefits: dental,
vision, hearing aids
·
Drug Coverage: average
annual total cost, formulary characteristics
·
Network Access: characterized
as broad to narrow
·
Creative Supplemental
Benefits: telehealth, acupuncture, home care, home safety equipment,
transportation, fitness benefits, chiropractors and more.
An online survey was
conducted which invited senior consumers from the client’s own Medicare service
area to participate.
The Results
The approach led to
several high-value deliverables: written findings, an online market simulator,
and special analyses from the Max-Diff component.
The online simulator
allowed researchers and the client to create an unlimited number of market
scenarios. These scenarios were built to test how changes in benefits
and costs cause consumer share of preference to change. Clients use these
results to identify their optimal product designs.
Through Max-Diff, the
client was able to measure the value of over-the-counter drug benefits,
wellness programs, in-home safety evaluations, chiropractic benefits,
transportation, telehealth, and many other creative ideas for seizing the MAPD
opportunity.
In the end, the client
has greater confidence in decisions about out-of-network cost sharing, the
structure of hospitalization costs, having a better than average dental
benefit, and the most in-demand supplemental benefits. All this plus,
conjoint analysis is an excellent tool for evaluating own and competitor
brands.
No comments:
Post a Comment