Nevada lawmakers recently passed a public option bill, which
experts say is the most ambitious and aggressive in a wave of similar policies
that have been seriously discussed in recent years. Payers and providers alike
objected to the bill, which will go into effect in 2026.
Nevada's public option bill will require any carrier that
participates in the state's Medicaid managed care program or individual
exchange to provide a silver- or gold-level public option plan. Premiums for
those plans will be set 5% lower than the benchmark silver plan sold on the state
Affordable Care Act exchange, and both individuals and small group purchasers
will be able to buy into the plan.
Any provider that has a network agreement with the state
employee health plan or a Medicaid plan will be required to join the public
option plan’s network. Payer industry groups opposed the plan.
"We urge you to address Nevada's uninsured rate by building
on the strength of the private market. A government run public option will hurt
people who are left behind in the individual market," said Jeanette
Thornton, a senior vice president at America's Health Insurance Plans, in testimony submitted to Nevada's legislature on May 4.
Kathy Hempstead, senior policy adviser at the Robert Wood
Johnson Foundation, says that Nevada's public option goes further than Washington's, which launched this year.
"It's using some really important leverage to get
participation from both plans and providers. It goes way beyond what Washington
did by actually requiring plans that are offering Medicaid to make a public
option offer. It's a little bit more ambitious," she says.
David Anderson, a research associate at the Duke University
Margolis Center for Health Policy, says that he thinks the Nevada plan has a
more realistic chance of creating a sustainable downward trend in costs.
"It's aggressive, and it's also very well thought
out," Anderson says. He adds that the small-group buy in is one of the
most important parts of the bill.
"Fully insured small group is a reasonably good-size
market. It has a good amount of stability and fairly low risk," he says.
"Fundamentally a carrier is a risk management entity, so low premium
levels overall shouldn't do much [to lower profitability] because they should
be able to extract that out of their provider network…. [It's] a market segment
that they do pretty well in."
No comments:
Post a Comment