Wednesday, November 27, 2019

New Medicare plan finder can mislead seniors to higher costs


Critics say tool can cause confusion by obscuring out-of-pocket costs
By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR of the Associated Press Nov 22, 2019
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
WASHINGTON — Medicare’s revamped prescription plan finder can steer unwitting seniors to coverage that costs much more than they need to pay, according to people who help with sign-ups, as well as program experts.
Serving about 60 million Medicare recipients, the plan finder is the most commonly used tool on Medicare.gov and just got its first major update in a decade. The Trump administration has hailed the new version and Medicare Administrator Seema Verma said it will empower beneficiaries to take advantage of their coverage options.
But as open enrollment goes into the home stretch Thanksgiving week, critics said the new tool can create confusion by obscuring out-of-pocket costs that seniors should factor into their decisions.
“I want to make sure people are given the most accurate information and they’re making the best decision — because they are the ones stuck with it,” said Ann Kayrish, senior program manager for Medicare at the National Council on Aging, a nonpartisan organization that advocates for seniors and provides community services.
Government programs mixing health care and technology have faced struggles. Despite billions spent to subsidize electronic medical records, getting different systems to communicate remains a challenge. The Obama administration’s launch of HealthCare.gov resulted in an embarrassing debacle when the website froze up the first day.
The leading Democrat on the Senate Aging Committee said he’s hearing concerns from constituents and organizations that assist Medicare beneficiaries. Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey said he will ask Medicare to grant seniors who’ve had problems a second chance to sign up, called a “special enrollment period.”
“It’s obviously an effort that needs a lot more work to meet the legitimate expectations of seniors,” said Casey. “Especially when you launch something new, (it) can go awry. People steered in the wrong direction should get a measure of fairness.”
The Medicare plan finder’s issue stems from a significant change the agency made for 2020.
The plan with the lowest premium now gets automatically placed on top, with the monthly premium displayed in large font.
Medicare’s previous plan finder automatically sorted plans by total cost, not just premiums.
But premiums are only one piece of information.
When out-of-pocket expenses such as copays are factored in, the plan with the lowest total annual cost is often not the first one shown by the plan finder.
It takes extra work for a Medicare enrollee to discover that.
“If they pick the plan based solely on the premium they are likely getting a plan that could cost them thousands more in a calendar year,” said Christina Reeg of the Ohio Department of Insurance. She heads a program that helps Medicare enrollees try to find the right plan.
In a statement, Medicare said the monthly premium is a cost that consumers understand and will always be an important decision factor.
But the agency also said total cost paid out-of-pocket is at least equally, if not more important, particularly for people who take prescription drugs — as do most seniors. Medicare said it’s testing ways to encourage consumers to look at total costs, such as a pop-up.
The agency said it chose to prominently display premiums because user testing showed that’s what consumers are familiar with. The total annual cost is included, but in smaller font.
That’s puzzling to Kayrish. The lowest premium “doesn’t necessarily translate to lowest cost over the year,” she explained.
Consumers using the plan finder first enter their medications and dosages. To get it to find plans by lowest total annual cost, they must take a few more steps, said Kayrish.
After the screen displays initial search results, consumers should look for the drop-down menu on the right of the screen. Next, she said, select the feature that lets you re-sort plans by “lowest drug + premium cost.”
A reporter’s sample search on a list of six medications for high blood pressure, high cholesterol and diabetes returned 29 plans in the Washington, D.C., area, topped by a lowest-premium option for $13.20 a month.
But after re-sorting for the lowest total cost, the best deal was a plan with a monthly premium of $25.80.
When out-of-pocket expenses were factored in, the second plan cost about $5,800 less a year than the initial lowest-premium option the plan finder displayed.
Costs can vary so much because plans have different coverage designs and they don’t pay the same prices to drugmakers.
And Kayrish said there’s another issue: The new plan finder can return options that don’t cover all of a patient’s medications.
If a low-premium plan has very high out-of-pocket costs, it’s a clue that some of your drugs may not be covered. Check plan details.
Some academic experts compared the old and new versions of the Medicare plan finder and confirmed the problems flagged by hands-on users.
Their review also found improvements. Among them:
Consumers can enter their Medicare number and the new plan finder automatically fills in all the medications the program paid for. (Consumer advocates recommend double-checking this list.)
The new tool can be used more easily on mobile devices and tablets.
The revamped plan finder allows consumers to compare across Part D drug plans and Medicare Advantage medical plans.
“The new plan finder is in many ways improved, but it did take a meaningful step backward by not doing more to highlight its most useful output— the total cost estimate,” said Brian McGarry, an assistant professor at the University of Rochester in New York. He’s the lead author of a recent online article about the plan finder for Health Affairs.
Seniors have until Dec. 7 to pick or switch “Part D” prescription drug plans or, if they’re seeking comprehensive medical care through a private insurer, a Medicare Advantage plan. Coverage takes effect Jan. 1.

No comments:

Post a Comment