Andrew Strohman, Health Care Data Analyst November 8, 2019
Senator Elizabeth Warren recently released her new Medicare for All (M4A)
plan, which she claims would require $20.5 trillion in new federal spending
over a 10-year period to finance, substantially less than the $32-34.67
trillion estimated by organizations such as the Urban Institute, the Mercatus
Center, and the Center for Health and Economy. While Warren’s underlying cost
assumptions are debatable, it is important to look at her funding streams, as
well. First, since M4A would abolish private insurance, employers’ existing
health insurance payments would be replaced by a mandated Employer Medicare
Contribution of $8.8 trillion (while maintaining current tax deductions on
employer health spending). Warren also estimates increased take-home pay for
employees under M4A, which would be subject to existing income taxes and yield
$1.4 trillion in revenue. Next, better enforcement of existing tax law, Warren
claims, would bring in an additional $2.3 trillion. Undefined reforms to
immigration and an elimination of the Overseas Contingency Operations Fund
(OCO) would bring in $1.2 trillion, combined. Finally, new taxes on financial
firms, large corporations, and the top 1 percent of income earners would bring
in the remaining $6.8 trillion needed to fund the program, she asserts.
Data obtained from the Elizabeth Warren
campaign
https://www.americanactionforum.org/weekly-checkup/medicare-for-all-ascendant-yes-but-popular/#ixzz654f6NhQf
Follow @AAF on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment