Washington Times
(DC) September 20, 2018
Andrew Gillum, the
Democratic gubernatorial candidate in Florida, says the state has left some
700,000 poor residents without health coverage by refusing to sign up for
Obamacare's expansion of Medicaid.
He has vowed to
take the money if he wins election.
Elsewhere, voters
themselves will get to decide in referendums in some of the nation's reddest
states whether to join the Medicaid expansion, turning November into a
make-or-break moment for President Obama's signature health care law.
Medicaid expansion
has been the quiet workhorse of the law, extending coverage to roughly 12
million people making at or just above the poverty line in dozens of states.
Republicans in
Washington have repeatedly looked to rein in the Medicaid expansion as part of
their broader efforts to curb the 2010 law.
But a "blue
wave" in the November elections giving control of either chamber of
Congress to Democrats would end that.
"If the
Democrats take the House, repeal of the Medicaid expansion is off the table. Even
if Republicans hold the House narrowly, they will have a hard time holding
their caucus together for repeal," said Timothy Jost, a professor at
Washington and Lee University who tracks the debate.
Democratic gains
also might convince state-level holdouts that Medicaid expansion is a winning
issue among voters — a dynamic that helped Virginia Democrats make major gains
in the state legislature in 2017, then break a GOP blockade and expand Medicaid
while adding work requirements on the newly eligible.
Voters in Idaho,
Nebraska and Utah will get to decide directly whether to accept the expansion.
And voters in
Montana will be asked whether to keep its expansion intact beyond 2019, when
the current policy would expire unless the legislature steps in.
A Kaiser Family
Foundation poll from February found more than half (56 percent) of those in
nonexpansion states think their governments should augment their programs,
while 3 in 4 people nationwide had a favorable opinion of Medicaid overall.
"Ballot
initiatives are a powerful tool because politicians in Washington are so out of
touch with what voters actually want, which is more health care, not
less," said Jonathan Schleifer, executive director of the Fairness
Project, which spearheaded the petitions.
In Florida,
expansion's prospects depend on the outcome of the governor's race, in which
Mr. Gillum, Tallahassee's mayor, is running on a pro-Obamacare platform against
Republican nominee Ron DeSantis.
After Texas,
Florida has the most residents who stand to gain coverage from Medicaid
expansion among holdout states.
"We had an
opportunity to expand Medicaid for over 700,000 of the most medically needy
people in this state, and we said 'no,' leaving $6 billion alone in last year's
budget on the table," Mr. Gillum recently told NBC's "Meet the Press
Daily."
Analysts said that
even if he wins, he would have an uphill battle, since the GOP is likely to
maintain control of both sides of the state legislature.
Joan Alker,
executive director of the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown
University, said a potential breakthrough "depends on how strong the blue
wave is." She said the size of Democratic victories in Virginia helped
convince a few key Republican senators to flip their stance.
The DeSantis
campaign says expansion is a bad idea that would bust the state's budget, since
states must pick up a share of the cost, reaching 10 percent starting in 2020.
"Ron DeSantis
is focused on making health care more affordable for Floridians across our
state by pursuing patient-centered, market-based solutions, while Andrew
Gillum's massive Medicaid expansion would take money out of hard-working
Floridians' pockets by raising taxes," said spokesman David Vazquez.
https://insurancenewsnet.com/oarticle/medicaid-expansion-on-ballots-across-u-s-in-midterm-vote?utm_source=Newsletter#.W7VcdCX4-JA
No comments:
Post a Comment