Eakinomics: Send the
Jones Act to Davy Jones's Locker
Rise and shine for today’s Eakinomics quiz! The Jones Act is:
(a) an antiquated,
protectionist law that raises the costs shipping, especially for Hawaii and
American territories;
(b) something that Scott
Lincicome talks about incessantly, especially on social media,
and even to random women in airport bars;
(c) a roadblock to
humanitarian aid to Puerto Rico in the aftermath of Hurricane Fiona;
(d) all of the above.
The correct answer is: (d) all of the above. Section 27 of the Merchant
Marine Act of 1920, introduced by then-Senator Wesley Jones, regulates
coastal trade and requires that all goods transported by water between U.S.
ports be carried on ships constructed in the United States, fly the U.S.
flag, are owned by U.S. citizens, and are crewed by U.S. citizens. It is the
mother of all Buy America provisions and is accordingly indefensible as
economic policy.
As a matter of ongoing damage, it makes U.S. oil too expensive in Hawaii and
forces that state to rely on imported oil from Russia (which, of course, was
suspended in the aftermath of the brutal invasion of Ukraine). It raises
enormously the costs of goods in Samoa and Guam. But it is an ongoing
nightmare for Puerto Rico.
In recognition of these facts, the editorial board of The Washington Post has called for
repeal of the Jones Act, at least as it applies to Alaska,
Hawaii,and Puerto Rico. But short of full repeal, it makes perfect sense to
suspend the Jones Act to expedite the recovery from Hurricane Fiona.
As NBC News reported:
"A ship carrying much-needed diesel fuel has been unable to dock in
hard-hit southern Puerto Rico since Sunday while it awaits federal
authorization because of the Jones Act, a century-old shipping law. The delay
comes at a time when about 40% of power customers still do not have
electricity more than a week after Hurricane Fiona battered the island."
President Biden is already under pressure
to waive the Jones Act to allow this vessel (and other relief) to reach the
island. President Trump waived the Jones Act for 10 days; that seems like the
minimum one should do.
More generally, the Jones Acts should simply go. The notion was that it would
be a mechanism to support shipbuilding in the United States. It hasn’t. It
was supposed to generate a ready reserve of ships in the event of the need
for naval capability. Nobody believes it has. It has generated none of the
supposed benefits, imposed large costs on America and its territories, and
permitted the inflated prices to benefit the shipping middlemen. It is time
to sink the Jones Act.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment