Eakinomics: Beyond
Fear and Anger
Fear and anger are among the most powerful campaign forces. Recently,
Democrats have attempted
to make Social Security a midterm election campaign issue of the fear and
anger variety. CNBC quotes the head of the Social Security Works Political
Action Committee as saying: “There’s been a Republican Party offensive during
this cycle against Social Security.” That is far from true – there have been
no broad Republican platform commitments and only two senators have made
specific proposals.
Democrats have proposed nothing on Social Security. The leading legislative
proposal is from Congressman John Larson, whose Social
Security 2100: A Sacred Trust would substantially raise taxes and
offer greater benefits. As is typical of recent legislating, the bill would
make the benefit expansions temporary. The idea that any new benefit under
Social Security would be temporary is so comically absurd, it’s a wonder
Microsoft didn’t try to autocorrect the bill text. The kicker of course is
that assuming these “temporary” benefits are permanent, instead of extending
Social Security’s solvency, the bill would actually advance the date of the
Social Security Trust Funds’ exhaustion by
a year.
The goal of the Democrats’ PR offensive is simply to make people afraid for
their Social Security and angry about attempts to reform it.
That’s a shame because there is a real issue here. When the CBO released its
Long-Term Budget Outlook to exactly zero fanfare in July, it made quite clear
that the federal budget is going to hell in a handbasket*. Some of the key
features are in the chart (below). Shown in blue (and measured on the left
axis) is federal debt in the hands of the public as a percent of gross
domestic product. Mechanically, the federal budget is on track to enter an
unsustainable debt spiral.
This is driven (in orange, right axis) to a great extent by spending on
Social Security and federal health programs – Medicare, Medicaid, Child
Health Insurance Program, and Affordable Care Act subsidies. As a bonus, the
Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund will be exhausted inside of a decade
and the Social Security Trust Fund by 2035. In short, the programs are in
danger of failing their beneficiaries, their fiscal impacts are the driving
source of federal red ink, and the federal debt endangers the future of the
United States.
Reforming Social Security and health spending is necessary to getting control
of the federal debt. Reforming Social Security and health spending is
necessary to restore these programs as a source of security and not a fount
of financial risk. Reforming Social Security and health spending is a moral
obligation to current retirees and the next generations.
If politicians want to talk about Social Security and health programs, that
is what they should be talking about.
*Eakinomics September 1 Bonus: Per Google, that phrase has been found
associated with the American gold rush of the 1840s where men were lowered by
hand in baskets down mining shafts to set explosives which could have deadly
consequences. Seems appropriate for an exploding debt spiral.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment